Yokohama Geolandar CV4S vs Hankook Kinergy 4S2 X (H750A) tires

All-weather tires are always in high demand, as they're good substitutes for people who desire increased grip during mild to severe winters without compromising traction during the rest of the year. Apart from helping customers who don't want to maintain and store specialized winter tires, they fill a void left by all-season tires that are only suitable for light snow. With revised tread formulas, more aggressive tread patterns, improved siping patterns, and other features for confidence in mud and snow, all-weather tires are designed to provide improved winter traction. This comparison article pits the Yokohama Geolandar CV4S against the Hankook Kinergy 4S2 X (H750A) to see which tire is better for your needs.

Our team at SimpleTire has developed a grading system called SimpleScore to provide you with an instant overview of a tire's capacities and performance. We rate factors like traction, handling, and longevity and assign scores after reviewing each tire's spec sheet, reviews, manufacturer information, and other data points. We also include an average SimpleScore with each tire to help you get a general impression. Given below are the results for the Yokohama Geolandar CV4S and Hankook Kinergy 4S2 X (H750A).

Yokohama Geolandar CV4S

• Traction: 8.5
• Handling: 8.6
• Longevity: 9.0
• Overall average SimpleScore: 8.7

Hankook Kinergy 4S2 X (H750A)

• Traction: 8.5
• Handling: 8.7
• Longevity: 8.5
• Overall average SimpleScore: 8.5

Yokohama Geolandar CV4S tires

The Japanese tire manufacturer Yokohama offers tires in a number of categories, though they are less expensive and less well-known than comparable tires made by leading tire manufacturers like Pirelli and Bridgestone. The Yokohama Geolandar CV4S, which is intended for SUVs and CUVs, has a robust and durable construction that adds to its long lifespan. You can anticipate a comfortable and accommodating ride in addition to enhanced performance and agility. This tire provides great traction thanks to its sophisticated tread design and high tread depth, while the sturdy construction guarantees a healthy tread life. The tread pattern is randomized and computer-tuned for less noise and more comfort. There is also a healthy mileage warranty available for this tire, regarding which the specifics will be provided later. The real difference can be seen in the SimpleScore ratings, where the Geolandar CV4S scores an 8.7.

Hankook Kinergy 4S2 X (H750A) tires

As an all-weather tire built for sedans, minivans, CUVs, and coupes, the Hankook Kinergy 4S2 X (H750A) ensures strong year-round performance and traction. A high grip silica compound is most helpful for grip on all types of surfaces. Low rolling resistance on this tire ensures high fuel efficiency, and a slush edge in the shoulder leads to great cornering performance on snowy roads. The Kinergy 4S2 X (H750A) features a suitable carcass for durability and Three Peak Mountain certification is available for severe winter service. It gets optimized variations for a comfortable and quiet ride. We found this SUV/crossover tire suitable for an average SimpleScore of 8.5.

Yokohama Geolandar CV4S vs Hankook Kinergy 4S2 X (H750A) tires on traction

The main reason to fit an all-weather instead of an all-season tire on an CUV, SUV, sedan, and minivan is to confidently negotiate through moderate to heavy ice and snow, with the latter providing suitable grip only in light snow. Both th Yokohama Geolandar CV4S and the Hankook Kinergy 4S2 X (H750A) feature the Three Peak Mountain Snowflake symbol rating that makes them suitable for use in moderate to heavy snow. While the Geolandar CV4S showcases an advanced tread design, its tread depth is also slightly higher than that of the Kinergy 4S2 X (H750A).

Although the Geolandar CV4S features an asymmetric tread pattern and the Kinergy 4S2 X (H750A) displays a directional pattern, the combination of tread compound properties and tread depth bring the scores closer together. Both tires were given traction scores of 8.5.

ADVANTAGE: Tie

Yokohama Geolandar CV4S vs. Hankook Kinergy 4S2 X (H750A) tires on handling

The Yokohama Geolandar CV4S was created specifically to perform well in the rain and withstand hydroplaning. It shows a little deeper tread depth than the Hankook Kinergy 4S2 X (H750A) and is offered in H, T, and V speed ratings. On the Geolandar CV4S, a novel polymer blend has been applied to improve traction and performance. This tire showcases a great blend of versatility and performance, leading to a handling score of 8.6.

On the other hand, high density summer sipes on the Hankook Kinergy 4S2 X (H750A) maintain stiffness in the tread blocks for great dry performance. Additionally, the tire also features a concave tie-bar for better year-round handling. H, V, and W are the speed ratings available here, which means it can be used to attain greater speeds. Wide lateral grooves are capable of better drain performance.

In terms of average handling SimpleScores, we have the Geolandar CV4S slightly behind the Kinergy 4S2 X (H750A), scoring 8.6 instead of 8.7 for the latter.

ADVANTAGE: Hankook Kinergy 4S2 X (H750A)

Yokohama Geolandar CV4S vs. Hankook Kinergy 4S2 X (H750A) tires on longevity

Longevity is the area where Yokohama has a definitive edge over Hankook. While it features a 60,000 mile limited manufacturer warranty, there is no such assurance on the Hankook. The durable construction and higher tread depth of the Yokohama also help it gain a slight edge in terms of longer tread life. In comparison, the high grip silica compound on the Hankook results in lower rolling resistance, thereby ensuring a higher fuel efficiency. An equilibrium polyester carcass plays in increasing durability of the Hankook tire.

Based on the above, the Yokohama receives a 9.0 and the Hankook gets an 8.5 in terms of longevity scores.

ADVANTAGE: Yokohama Geolandar CV4S

When to use each

Both the Geolandar CV4S and the Kinergy 4S2 X (H750A) are Three Peak Mountain Snowflake certified, showing their great abilities to function in moderate to severe winter weather at temperatures below 45 degrees Fahrenheit. However, do remember to not use them in extremely low temperatures and heavier snow for more than 6 months as there are no substitutes for winter tires in such conditions. With the Geolandar CV4S featuring an asymmetric pattern and the Kinergy 4S2 X (H750A) displaying a directional pattern, both tires are even matches for traction. However, the Yokohama is a better tire in the wet as compared to the Hankook. Warranty on the Yokohama is likely to make the purchase more in favor of it.

All-weather tires are a wonderful option when you have to cope with challenging winter weather, but not the extreme kind. By preventing the need for winter tires, these tires spare you the hassle of having to dismount them and find a place to store them until winter returns.

Which one should you choose?

Competition between the Yokohama Geolandar CV4S and the Hankook Kinergy 4S2 X (H750A) is neck-and-neck across the parameters above. The Hankook ensures better handling, and the Yokohama leads to higher longevity, and both tires are tied on the traction front. This brings us to the prices on the two tires- the Geolandar CV4S is priced at $167.99 ($671.96 for 4) and the Kinergy 4S2 X (H750A) is available for $139.99 per tire ($559.96 for 4)

To summarize, We have the following reasons for purchasing the Yokohama Geolandar CV4S:

• More faith in the Yokohama brand
• Better wet traction and performance
• Better traction and performance with the newest polymer blend
• 60,000 mile limited manufacturer tread life warranty

Compared to the above, the reasons for buying the Hankook Kinergy 4S2 X (H750A) are:

• Buying the cheaper tire
• Traction is at par with the Geolandar CV4S
• Better dry traction

Still unsure which tire to buy? Fortunately, SimpleTire is here to help. Our helpful agents are more than happy to assist you in selecting the right tire for your ride and budget.