Yokohama Geolandar CV G058 vs Falken Ziex CT60 A/S tires

Yokohama and Falken both originated in Japan and are amongst the popular tire manufacturers in the world. While Yokohama was established in 1917, Falken entered the market in 1983 and their Geolandar tires and Ziex tires are amongst the most dependable all-season tires.

Each brand utilizes cutting-edge technologies, and high-grade materials, and puts a ton of time, effort, and research into making new-gen tires that get the most innovative and performance-worthy designs. The Yokohama Geolandar CV G058 and Falken Ziex CT60 A/S are no different and inherit their respective brands’ capabilities very well. While both of these tires are made for use on CUVs and SUVs, the Geolandar tire is additionally compatible with minivans.

These all-season tires are engineered and optimized for traction and grip in dry, wet, and light winter conditions. On the performance front, both of these tires are great, but there has to be one that stands out. So, let’s compare Yokohama Geolandar CV G058 vs Falken Ziex CT60 A/S tires utilizing SimpleScore and find out where each tire excels and which one might be right for you.

Yokohama Geolandar CV G058 tires

Introduced in March 2020, the Yokohama Geolandar CV G058 is an all-season tire that features an asymmetrical tread design. This tire is designed for use on CUVs, SUVs, and minivans and is optimized to provide enhanced wet and winter grip, longer tread life, and quieter and comfy rides; credits its advanced compound, innovative tread pattern, and cutting-edge technologies.

Overall, the Geolandar CV G058 gets an impressive SimpleScore of 8.9, thanks to its long-lasting tread life, solid handling response, and impressive traction response.

Falken Ziex CT60 A/S tires

Made for use on CUVs and SUVs, the Falken Ziex CT60 A/S is also an all-season tire launched in October 2017. It sports a symmetrical tread design and is optimized for longer tread life and dependable year-round performance. The tire boasts various technologies that enhance the handling response and stability, and make the tire adaptable to diverse weather conditions.

Overall, the Ziex CT60 boasts a solid SimpleScore of 8.6, thanks to its extended tread life, enhanced handling performance, and dependable year-round traction performance.

Yokohama Geolandar CV G058 vs Falken Ziex CT60 A/S tires on traction

All-season tires are designed and engineered for year-round use in dry, wet, and light wintry conditions. This allows the drivers to use them in diverse conditions, without swapping for another set of tires with a change in season.

On the traction front, the Geolandar CV G058 sports an 8.4 out of 10. Yokohama has optimized the tire to provide confident year-round traction performance. It features hundreds of 2D and 3D sipes that boost traction in dry, wet, and light snow conditions. The micro silica-infused polymer blend also increases traction performance in wet and light winter weather conditions. It features four grooves on the tread, two center ones being straight wider grooves, while the other two on the ends are similar to the center ones but are slightly zigzag-shaped. All these grooves ease water dispersion for increased water channeling and better traction performance in wet conditions.

Contrarily, the Ziex CT60 A/S boasts an 8.5 out of 10 SimpleScore rating in traction. The asymmetric tread pattern of this tire features polygon-shaped inside grooves that provide the tread additional edges to increase wet and snow traction. The four wide circumferential grooves of the tire prevent hydroplaning and facilitate quick water dispersion, ensuring solid contact with the surface in rainy conditions. Additionally, the sipes on the shoulders also provide a solid footprint in wet and snow conditions and result in improved traction performance.

When it comes to year-round traction performance, the Ziex CT60 A/S is slightly better than the Geolandar CV G058.

ADVANTAGE: Ziex CT60 A/S

Yokohama Geolandar CV G058 vs Falken Ziex CT60 A/S tires on handling

While considering a tire for purchase, traction is certainly an important factor but handling is also another important attribute, especially in the case of all-season tires. Tires with better handling performance provide confident high-speed stability, enhanced cornering performance, and seamless lane changing. The good thing is that both Yokohama and Falken have focused on providing better handling performance.

With a handling SimpleScore of 8.6 on a scale of 10, the Geolandar CV G058 offers reliable steering response and controllability. The handling performance is improved by the staggered multi-pitch tread design that has elements to provide better surefootedness, controllability, and cornering performance. The tread is built using CV-2 compound that features micro-silica and a special polymer blend to maintain flexibility in low temps and deliver improved handling performance.

Contrarily, the Ziex CT60 A/S is slightly ahead of the Geolandar CV G058 on the handling front and scores an 8.7 out of 10. The asymmetric tread pattern of the tire is offered with a high-rigidity outside shoulder rib that provides better stability and handling. Its silica-enriched tread compound boosts wet performance in rainy and light winter conditions. The all-season tread compound of the tire reduces the braking distance, providing a better command to the driver. Likewise, the tread puts more rubber on the road for increased handling performance and stability.

While the handling of the Geolandar CV G058 is on the great side, it is slightly behind the Ziex CT60 A/S.

ADVANTAGE: Ziex CT60 A/S

Yokohama Geolandar CV G058 vs Falken Ziex CT60 A/S tires on longevity

Whether you’re buying a year-round performing all-season tire for your CUV, SUV, or minivan, longevity is always going to be one of your key priorities. You might not want a tire that wears quickly and would wish for something that serves optimally for a longer period. Therefore, analyzing longevity is very important and while comparing the SimpleScores of the Geolandar CV G058 and the Ziex CT60 A/S, we found the biggest gap between the two.

First, let’s talk about the Geolandar CV G058. On the longevity front, this tire scores a whopping 9.9 SimpleScore on a scale of 10 and promises a long-lasting service life because of many great features like an optimized contact patch and proprietary tread compound. The flat and wider profile of the tire is optimized to evenly distribute driving pressures and weight to avoid the risk of premature and uneven wear. The rounded chamfered ribs of the tire also help in establishing even contact with the surface and provide a longer tread life. Likewise, the CV-2 compound of this all-season tire is also engineered to offer reliable, longer wear. This Yokohama tire comes with a 65,000-mile limited manufacturer tread life warranty, assuring the buyers that the tire is built to cover a good number of miles.

On the other hand, the Ziex CT60 A/S boasts a longevity SimpleScore of 8.9, which is great but slightly behind the rival’s rating in the same area. The tire gets a solid construction and its silica-enriched tread compound is also optimized for longer wear. The 3D canyon sipes of this tire interlock the shoulder blocks to prevent from wear occurring due to the vehicle’s higher center of gravity. Like the Yokohama Geolandar CV G058, the Falken Ziex CT60 A/S also comes with a 65,000-mile limited manufacturer tread life warranty, indicating that Falken too provides confidence to the drivers that they can worry-free drive for more miles.

When comparing both the tires, the Yokohama all-season tire was found better on the longevity front than the Falken all-season tire.

ADVANTAGE: Yokohama Geolandar CV G058

When to use each

The Geolandar CV G058 and the Ziex CT60 A/S are both dependable all-season tires, optimized for use in dry, wet, and light wintry conditions. It is to be noted that these tires aren’t Three Peak Mountain Snowflake certified and therefore, in extreme winter conditions, they might not perform as responsive as the winter tires. But, they are good for year-round use on paved dry and wet surfaces. If you’re looking for something ideal for off-road or on- or off-road use, then you may skip to other choices like all-terrain or rugged-terrain tires, however, for dependable use on pavement both these tires are great performers.

The Geolandar CV G058 is offered in 16- to 20-inch rim options and is good for use on CUVs, SUVs, and minivans. Before adding these tires to your shopping cart, make sure that you choose the right tire size.

Contrarily, the Ziex CT60 A/S is available in 16- to 22-inch rim sizes, which further expands the compatibility of CUVs or SUVs that have bigger wheel sizes. Make sure that you check your tires’ size for a rightful installation.

Which one should you choose?

Now, the big question is which all-season tire should you choose for your vehicle? When we analyzed the SimpleScore of the Geolandar CV G058 and the Ziex CT60 A/S, we found that the Yokohama Geolandar CV G058 slightly excels in the race with an overall SimpleScore of 8.9 when compared to the 8.6 rating of the Ziex CT60 A/S. But, as we discussed in this comparison both of these tires are different in one or the other way, and therefore, you must choose them after considering all the discussed factors (traction, handling, and longevity) and prioritizing what is important for you.

Price is in most cases one of the biggest factors in finalizing a tire. It is to be noted that the Geolandar CV G058 will cost you at least $156.99 per tire, while the Ziex CT60 A/S costs at least $124.00 per tire. That means a set of four Yokohama tires will cost you at least $627.97, while a set of four Falken tires will cost you at least $496.00.

Based on SimpleScore, you should choose the Yokohama Geolandar CV G058 if you:

• Drive a full-size CUV like the Honda Pilot, a subcompact CUV like the Audi Q3, a cargo or passenger van like the Ford Transit, or an SUV the Jeep Grand Cherokee.
• Need a tire that has an excellent tread life (9.9 vs 8.9 in longevity).
• Need a tire that comes with attractive warranty coverage.
• Are comfortable paying extra to own a tire from a brand that’s widely known for its range of tires dedicated to CUVs, SUVs, and light trucks.

On the other hand, you should prefer the Falken Ziex CT60 if you:

• Drive a mid-size CUV like the Nissan Murano, a compact SUV like the Chevrolet Equinox, a mid-size SUV like the Subaru Outback, or a full-size SUV like the Dodge Durango.
• Want a tire that costs less but delivers better handling (8.7 vs 8.6 in handling) and traction (8.5 vs 8.4 in traction) performance.
• Need a tire that is backed with a solid tread life warranty.
• Need a tire that’s available in rim sizes above 20 inches.
• Are comfortable buying a tire that might not be the best in longevity but is overall great on the performance front.

The Geolandar vs Ziex tires might not look like a comparison at the very first glance but when comparing them together in the all-season category, the SimpleScore analysis for various attributes reveals that they are indeed very close competitors. They both cater to somewhat similar vehicles in the market and fall in the same all-season category. However, the decision to buy one or the other depends largely on your vehicle, what’s your preference on the traction, handling, and longevity fronts, and how much you’re ready to spend.

Still not sure which tire to buy? Fortunately, SimpleTire is here to help as our helpful agents are more than happy to assist you in selecting the right tire for your ride and budget.