Yokohama Geolandar CV G058 vs Kumho Crugen HP71 tires

Yokohama and Kumho are the two popular tire manufacturers selling value-offering tires in the US tire market. While Yokohama represents cutting-edge Japanese tire technologies, Kumho is a South Korea-based manufacturer and is fully owned by Doublestar. Coming from these two respective manufacturers are the Geolandar and Crugen range of tires that fall in the all-season category.

The Yokohama Geolandar CV G058 and the Kumho Crugen HP71 tires, which we will compare today, are both built using innovative technologies and features and offer year-round performance in dry, wet, and light snow conditions. These tires are great performers and certainly do not disappoint, but for a buyer, it makes more sense to pick one that suits their vehicle and driving style the most!

Therefore, using our advanced tire rating system, SimpleScore, we will compare these tires to find out how they are overall and how they fare on traction, handling, and longevity. So, read this Yokohama Geolandar CV G058 vs. Kumho Crugen HP71 tire comparison and pick the best tire for yourself.

Yokohama Geolandar CV G058 tires

Let’s start with getting an overall understanding of the Yokohama Geolandar CV G058. Launched in 2012, this all-season tire is designed for use on CUVs, SUVs, and minivans. The tread and compound of the Geolandar CV G058 are optimized for improved wet and light winter grip, long-lasting tread life, and less noisy and more comfortable rides. Yokohama has ensured that the best features are introduced to deliver a great performance, and there’s also a generous tread life warranty offered with the tire.

It is because of the outstanding tread life warranty, responsive handling, and reliable traction performance, the Geolandar CV G058 is recognized with an overall SimpleScore rating of 8.9 on a scale of 10.

Kumho Crugen HP71 tires

The Kumho Crugen HP71, our second tire chosen for comparison, made its debut in 2017. This all-season tire is suitable for use on CUVs and SUVs and is optimized for use in dry, wet, and light winter weather conditions. Kumho’s engineering has ensured that the tire covers more miles without compromising on the comfort part. The tire manufacturer has also worked on noise reduction levels for a pleasant driving experience. In addition, a tread life warranty also adds to the convenient ownership.

Overall, the Kumho Crugent HP71 scores an 8.4 SimpleScore rating, which is attained because of its long-lasting tread life, dependable handling, and good traction performance.

Yokohama Geolandar CV G058 vs Kumho Crugen HP71 tires on traction

As all-season tires are suitable for year-round use in dry, wet, and light winter weather conditions, traction analysis becomes crucial. When we compared the traction scores of both tires, we found there was a big gap in their scores.

Yokohama Geolandar CV G058 scores an 8.4 SimpleScore rating in traction, which means the tire can offer reliable grip in dry, wet, and light winter conditions. The tire utilizes CV-2 compound with micro-silica that increases traction in wet conditions. Similarly, the circumferential grooves evacuate water from the footprint for optimum hydroplaning resistance. Traction performance in light winter weather is enhanced by the flexible tread that allows the tire to adapt to changing temperatures. Thanks to the 2D/3D combination sipes, a good number of biting edges are created to firmly grip the surface in light snow conditions, and likewise, the serrated outer grooves increase grip in wet conditions.

On the other hand, the Kumho Crugen HP71 scores an 8.2 SimpleScore rating in traction, which is slightly lower than the rival but is good enough to ensure that be it sunshine, rain, or light snow, the tire’s traction performance won’t disappoint you. There are features like full-depth sipes and lateral voids that help in gaining light snow traction, while the wide circumferential grooves prevent hydroplaning and boost wet grip. In addition, the sharper edges of blocks and further details across the shoulders and ribs add to increased traction performance. The all-season tread compound also contributes to reliable traction year-round.

No doubt, the Crugen HP71 tire is a great choice with admirable traction and grip, but the Geolandar CV G058 excels the competitor with a slightly better rating.

ADVANTAGE: Yokohama Geolandar CV G058

Yokohama Geolandar CV G058 vs Kumho Crugen HP71 tires on handling

The tire’s ability to respond to the driver’s steering command relates directly to handling. Therefore, it is essential to understand how the two tires perform in this area. Handling also relates to aspects like stability, ride control, cornering, and lane-changing ability. When we analyzed both tires, we found that there was a marginal difference in the scores, indicating a slight variation in their handling ability.

The Geolandar CV G058 scores an 8.6 SimpleScore on the handling front, which is good enough to reflect the tire’s agility and ability to respond to the driver’s steering commands and offer a controlled ride. The use of a micro-silica compound ensures a solid grip for enhanced steering command and better braking performance. There are 2D/3D combination sipes that provide a good number of biting edges for increased handling performance in winter weather. With a wider footprint and flat contact patch, the tire’s ability to provide stability and maintain confident cornering performance is enhanced.

Contrarily, the Crugen HP71 scores an 8.4 SimpleScore rating in handling, indicating a decent controllability. The strong center rib and improved shoulder block help in quick handling performance, and similarly, the circumferential grooves provide the tire the ability to run with greater control, especially on wet and slick surfaces. Even the sidewalls of the Kumho Crugen HP71 are optimized to take the cornering pressures very well along with the shoulder blocks.

As we see, the Geolandar tires come out as a winner in the handling area as well, leaving the Crugen tires behind in the controllability race.

ADVANTAGE: Yokohama Geolandar CV G058

Yokohama Geolandar CV G058 vs Kumho Crugen HP71 tires on longevity

In the longevity area, the one that’s related to understanding if a tire can serve longer or not, we found that both tires were great, however, one of the two all-season tires was more outstanding than the other. Read on to learn more about this!

Commencing with the Geolandar CV G058, the tire is an exceptional choice on the longevity front as it scores a whopping 9.9 SimpleScore rating in this area. Backed by a limited manufacturer tread life warranty of 65,000 the tire confirms that it is built to last for miles. While the rounded rib profile helps in consistent contact with the road and ultimately results in longer wear, the flat and wear profile prevents uneven wear. Similarly, the CV-2 compound used in the CV G058 is optimized for long-lasting use.

On the contrary, the Kumho Crugen HP71 scores an 8.8 SimpleScore rating on a scale of 10. The optimized shoulder blocks and sturdy center rib of the Crugen HP71 ensure even wear and long-lasting tread life, while the reinforced construction and solid rubber compound help slow down the wear rate. The tire is also backed by a 65,000 miles limited manufacturer tread life warranty, which indicates that the tire can be trusted for a long-lasting service. Additionally, the wide and flat footprint of the Crugen HP71 ensures that the changes of uneven wear are reduced.

In the longevity area as well, the Geolandar CV G058 takes a remarkable lead, scoring much higher than the Crugen HP71.

ADVANTAGE: Yokohama Geolandar CV G058

When to use each

Both, the Geolandar CV G058 and the Crugen HP71 are all-season tires and can be considered for year-round use in dry, wet, and light winter conditions. It is to be noted that the tire is not Three Peak Mountain Snowflake certified, and therefore, shouldn’t be considered for driving in severe winter weather conditions, in temperatures below 45 degrees Fahrenheit. Additionally, the tire is suitable only for paved roads and must not be considered as a choice for off-road driving.

While the Geolandar tires are suitable for use on CUVs, SUVs, and minivans that have rims ranging between 16- to 20-inch, the Crugen tires can be used on CUVs and SUVs that have rims measuring between 16- to 22-inch.

Which one should you choose?

Looking at the SimpleScores, we found that the Geolandar tires were ahead with an overall 8.9 SimpleScore rating, compared to the Crugen tires which scored an overall SimpleScore rating of 8.5. But, both tires are unique in their own ways and therefore, you must weigh them against each other to pick a suitable choice.

Price-wise, the Geolandar CV G058 from Yokohama is available at a starting price of at least $156.99 per tire, while the Crugen HP71 from Kumho is offered at a starting price of at least $145.00 per tire. This means a set of four Yokohama tires will cost you at least $627.96, while a set of four Kumho tires will cost you at least $580.00.

Based on SimpleScore, you should prefer the Geolandar CV if you:

• Drive a 3-row mid-size family SUV like the Toyota Highlander, an off-road, full-sized SUV like the Honda Pilot, or a mid-size 3-row luxury SUV like the Volvo XC90
• Need a tire that’s better in traction
• Need a tire that’s better in handling
• Need a tire that’s better in longevity
• Are comfortable paying slightly more to own a better tire

On the other hand, you should consider the Kumho Crugen HP71 if you:

• Drive a mid-size 3-row SUV like the Dodge Durango, a full-size 3-row SUV like the Chevrolet Tahoe, a CUV like the Honda CR-V, or a compact SUV like the GMC Terrain
• Need a tire that’s more affordable yet offers reliable performance
• Need a tire that’s backed by a 65,000 miles limited manufacturer tread life warranty, standard for all sizes
• Need a tire that’s quiet and comfortable
• Want a tire that’s compatible with vehicles having over 20-inch rim size

Still not sure which tire to buy? Fortunately, SimpleTire is here to help as our helpful agents are more than happy to assist you in selecting the right tire for your ride and budget.